Loading...

Quality Assessment Results

Banitalebi_-_2021_-_Sprint_interval_training_vs._combined_aerobic__resistance_training_in_overweight_women_with_type_2.pdf

Status: Completed
Document Type: RCT
Assessment Tool: Cochrane RoB 2 (Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials) - Complete
Assessment completed!
17/17
Next check in: 5 seconds
23.5%
Overall Quality Score
4/17 criteria met

Assessment Details

Assessment Criterion AI Analysis AI Judgment Issues
Was the allocation sequence random?
rct_d1_1
Raw response parsing failed. Original content: { "judgment": "low risk", "justification": "The document explicitly describes adequate random sequence generation through direct reference to...
low risk
Was the allocation sequence concealed until participants were enrolled and assigned to interventions?
rct_d1_2
Raw response parsing failed. Original content: { "judgment": "some concerns", ...
some concerns
Were there baseline imbalances that suggest a problem with randomization?
rct_d1_3
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Were participants aware of their assigned intervention during the trial?
rct_d2_1
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Were carers and people delivering the interventions aware of participants' assigned intervention during the trial?
rct_d2_2
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Were there deviations from the intended intervention that arose because of the experimental context?
rct_d2_3
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Was an appropriate analysis used to estimate the effect of assignment to intervention?
rct_d2_4
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Were data for this outcome available for all, or nearly all, participants randomized?
rct_d3_1
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Is there evidence that the result was not biased by missing outcome data?
rct_d3_2
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Could missingness in the outcome depend on its true value?
rct_d3_3
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Was the method of measuring the outcome inappropriate?
rct_d4_1
Raw response parsing failed. Original content: { "judgment": "some concerns", "justification": "The document explicitly identifies HbA1c as the primary outcome and HOMA-IR as...
some concerns
Could measurement or ascertainment of the outcome have differed between intervention groups?
rct_d4_2
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Were outcome assessors aware of the intervention received by study participants?
rct_d4_3
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Could assessment of the outcome have been influenced by knowledge of intervention received?
rct_d4_4
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Were the data that produced this result analyzed in accordance with a pre-specified analysis plan?
rct_d5_1
Raw response parsing failed. Original content: { "judgment": "some concerns", "justification": "The document provides insufficient evidence to confirm whether analyses followed a pre-specified plan. While primary/secondary outcomes are declare...
some concerns
Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected, on the basis of the results, from multiple eligible outcome measurements?
rct_d5_2
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Is the numerical result being assessed likely to have been selected, on the basis of the results, from multiple eligible analyses of the data?
rct_d5_3
Raw: None...
Error: Parse Failure
Assessment Summary
17
Total Criteria
4
Criteria Met
13
Issues Found
23.5%
Quality Score

Document Preview